Get MBA Entrance Exams Updates on Whatsapp & Email!GET UPDATES NOW
Published: Tuesday, 6 June, 2017 10:50 AM
MBA aspirants must be updated with General Awareness on current affairs. General Awareness topics with analytically drawn conclusions will benefit you in XAT, IIFT, NMAT, SNAP ,CMAT, MAT, and later in Post exams screening Tests like WAT, GD & PI , Essay writing.
Read Current Affairs Topic: Implications of OBOR
The One Belt One Road (OBOR), also known as the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’ (BRI), is the most ambitious development project proposed by China that aims to connect Eurasian and African countries to boost economic cooperation. This would be akin to the historical Silk Route which connected China with Central Asian and Arab countries.
The Silk Route during its heydays helped in the development of the regions it traversed through. The OBOR is the modern day Silk Route that would connect countries in Asia Africa and Europe with the network of railways, roads, pipelines, power plants etc.
The OBOR action plan comprises two main components:
China is selling the initiative as an economic project. China’s National Development and Reform Commission outlined following aims of OBOR:
For the past few years, the growth rate of China is slowing down. Though China itself is the second largest economy with largest population in the world, the domestic demand is unable to generate the required growth. For that matter, it sees international trade as the driving force for the future prosperity. Countries participating in OBOR are expected to be the future trade partners of China.
Currently, China is reeling with overproduction. Due to moderate growth and lack of demand, it is unable to work at full capacity. The OBOR will link production centres in China with markets and natural resource centres across the world.
China also hopes it will increase use of the Renminbi not just as a transactional currency but as a reserve currency with this project by becoming major trade partner of the participating countries. A substantial part of the US consumption is funded by China as it holds treasury bonds worth USD1.2 trillion. It also holds around USD4.0 trillion of the foreign exchange reserves. Since the interest on US treasury bonds is as low as 2%, it is better for China to use this money to fund OBOR which will also serve as measure to counter the geopolitical influence of the US which is its major long term rival.
Apart from the economic reasons, the OBOR has some political reasons as well. As the global clout of China is increasing, it is aspiring to take over the leadership role from the US and the OBOR might be instrumental in its aspirations. Once completed, OBOR will extend China’s economic, diplomatic and military power well beyond its borders and across the world placing China virtually on par with the US.
Political pundits also believe countries where, China is funding the OBOR, will have to play in accordance with the rules framed by China. In these countries, China will deploy its surplus manpower to build them, and idle state-owned enterprises to construct them thus giving a boost to the Chinese economy.
On May 14, 2017, China hosted a conference for OBOR which was boycotted by India. Apart from India, Japan was another major country that boycotted the conference while the US sent its dignitary at the last moment after initial hesitation.
The foremost concern of India regarding OBOR is the issue of territorial integrity and sovereignty issue. The China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which is the Pakistani leg of grand OBOR plan, passes through the Gilgit Baltistan regions of Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (POK) which is claimed by India to be its integral part.
Another Indian concern is that CPEC will connect Pakistan Gwadar port with Xinjiang region of China. The Gwadar port developed by China can also become the future naval base of China which can even dock submarines.
The success of OBOR depends upon the stability of the regions from where it passes. Many regions along the new silk route are volatile in nature and will distract the trade.
Many small nations are apprehensive about the real intention of Chinese as view the initiative as a form of neo-colonialism to grab the local resources. Already, many experts in Pakistan are concerned due to the opaqueness of CPEC and diminishing say of Pakistan in the project as most work is contracted to Chinese companies only.
India too had slammed the project calling it little more than a colonial enterprise. The rules of engagement in OBOR are opaque, ambiguous and unclear. India in its statement said that connectivity initiatives must be based on universally recognised international norms, good governance, rule of law, openness, transparency and equality. Project may also cause unsustainable debt burden on the partner countries as happened in Sri Lanka where Hambantota port that was developed by China had left the former in reeling under the debt of USD8.0 billion.
Stay informed, Stay ahead and stay inspired with MBA Rendezvous
Let's start by understanding what's meant by the term disruptive technology. A disruptive technology is basically one which displaces an established one, thereby shaking up an entire industry
The Start-up India and Stand Up India programmes were initiated basically to inculcate the habit of entrepreneurship among the fellow Indians particularly the youth
The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) is one of the most significant international organization formed in the post-cold war era.
On June 1, 2017, the newly elected United States (US) President Donald announced his decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement on climate change, which came onto force on November 4, 2016.
General Awareness Topic 'Environment Protection & Development Can Go Hand In Hand' GK/Current affairs topic will benefit you in XAT, CMAT, MAT Exam besides in GD & PI.